Confused about Fruits Basket
Feb. 6th, 2011 12:50 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, I've owned the first four volumes of Fruits Basket for years; hadn't read them in awhile, but am now revisiting them because I think I can get the rest at the library, and well, something about it confuses me. Not within the story, but my reaction.
See, there are things about this that are really messed up and I know they're really messed up. Even after just reading vol. 1 again, Tohru has this messed-up passivity, and Kagura is a walking exercise in "Dude, not funny," pretty much like I remembered, and in neither case is this taken seriously as a bad thing. Like, Tohru expresses admiration for Kagura's love toward the guy she violently batters (and apparently extracted an "engagement" from when they were children by threatening him with a knife; I wanna see Kyo beat her up, I really do---seriously, some things just shouldn't be played for humor). A little later I recall an incident where Tohru just stubbornly refused to express her needs, even when it was clear to anyone with half a brain that she would have been doing the others a favor if she did, but it turns out okay because they're psychic or something and prioritize her needs without being asked---like I said, messed up.
But somehow, it has a charm to it that still draws me in, and however messed up it is, I just can't seem to not like it. That's the part I'm confused about. Mind there's still plenty of time...
(And I'm posting too late for anything more coherent than that...)
See, there are things about this that are really messed up and I know they're really messed up. Even after just reading vol. 1 again, Tohru has this messed-up passivity, and Kagura is a walking exercise in "Dude, not funny," pretty much like I remembered, and in neither case is this taken seriously as a bad thing. Like, Tohru expresses admiration for Kagura's love toward the guy she violently batters (and apparently extracted an "engagement" from when they were children by threatening him with a knife; I wanna see Kyo beat her up, I really do---seriously, some things just shouldn't be played for humor). A little later I recall an incident where Tohru just stubbornly refused to express her needs, even when it was clear to anyone with half a brain that she would have been doing the others a favor if she did, but it turns out okay because they're psychic or something and prioritize her needs without being asked---like I said, messed up.
But somehow, it has a charm to it that still draws me in, and however messed up it is, I just can't seem to not like it. That's the part I'm confused about. Mind there's still plenty of time...
(And I'm posting too late for anything more coherent than that...)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-06 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-06 05:42 pm (UTC)As dicey as it is to judge this, I'm already not holding much hope for accountability because it seems like the author doesn't see anything wrong with this crap (in this context), or wouldn't want to punish her characters anyway.
So, worth reading the whole thing, assuming no money is on the line?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-06 05:48 pm (UTC)